How does the media, controlled by vaccine manufacturers, affect our lives?
According to the expert, people should be given the opportunity to be experimental subjects because it helps expand scientific knowledge.
The latest pandemic article from USA Today raises many questions and seems like a horror scene embedded in a fantastic film, where thoughts have long departed from rationality, and psychopaths are driven to increasingly crazed actions against their victims.
The article, intended as propaganda and featured in the mainstream media, is intriguing not only for its lies and contradictions but also because it explicitly states that the "experts" have no idea about anything. They use people for experimentation as one would use rats, and, of course, they accept no responsibility for anything.
Based on an assumption, they start producing vaccines for people without knowing anything about the disease the vaccine is supposed to protect against, not even whether it can be transmitted to humans. Consequently, they also have no idea how the human body will react to the vaccine.
It takes years or even decades to bring any medication to market, but now it only takes a month or two to prepare a countermeasure for the most devastating pandemic of all time?
It is frightening to think that "experts" calmly declare that they have produced 4.8 million doses of vaccine intended for people, which have only been tested on ferrets.
Will vaccine supporters grasp the significance of this? And will they believe it will definitely work just because an "expert" said so?
And note the article's title: "Will Avian Influenza Be the Next Pandemic? Vaccines Have Been 'Prepared' in Case It Occurs."
And what is the article about? The exact opposite!
We learn that "the vaccine might be effective, but this is not guaranteed," because "it is also possible that by the time the virus evolves enough to become truly dangerous to humans, it will have changed so much that the vaccine produced here may no longer be effective."
But it is not just possible, it is certain that the virus will "change." One doesn’t need to be a virologist; knowing basic high school biology is enough to understand this.
So it won’t work. Not only because of the "transformation," but also because there have been no trials of the vaccine on humans infected with avian influenza.
Pay attention to the following sentences:
"To ensure the vaccine works effectively, two doses must be administered, with at least three weeks between them. It is unclear how much protection someone receives after the first dose. Seqirus did not disclose in their email responses when the vaccine doses expire or when they need to be replenished."
In other words: They have no idea about anything, but "the vaccines have been 'prepared' in case the pandemic does occur."
After this, we can only attribute the following statement to a lack of humor:
"Dawn O'Connell, the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, told USA TODAY: In previous outbreaks, the government's 'Achilles' heel' was that it did not produce enough vaccines in time to stop individual infections and slow the spread of the disease."
So, there is a vaccine developed based on an assumption for a disease about which they know nothing, tested only on ferrets and therefore not guaranteed to work, and indeed certain not to work. Yet it will provide hope for protection, because in the past, outbreaks were stopped because "enough vaccines were produced in time."
An empathetic person would show more respect even to earthworms when discussing their intellectual capabilities. Even they are not as foolish as these experts seem to think the public is.
It is worth highlighting one of the biggest psychopaths from the article:
"According to Dr. Nahid Bhadelia, vaccinating agricultural workers would not reduce the number of people severely infected with avian influenza, but she believes that the vaccine should be offered to them as part of a research experiment. This would only potentially help with severe illnesses and in expanding scientific knowledge."
In other words, Mrs. Frankenstein is saying that people should be given the opportunity to be experimental subjects because it helps expand scientific knowledge. The media enthusiastically conveys this message.
And this same deranged expert previously held the same views as the lead political advisor to the White House COVID-19 response team. Using this approach, the medical, political, and media elites inflicted illness and death upon countless people during COVID.
Unfortunately, many people have faced what the Moby Dick band predicted even before COVID:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTRcQOtOUHw
Source and where the images can be seen:https://www.szakacsarpad.com/p/emberek-mint-kiserleti-patkanyok
