After the Western leaders believed that Ukraine could attack Russian territories with the weapons they received...

After the Western leaders believed that Ukraine could attack Russian territories with the weapons they received, Moscow also responded: The Russians released Europe's nuclear map – targeting all NATO bases.

The Kremlin's response did not delay; the Russians - as a clear message - released Europe's 'nuclear map'!

The Berlin government announced on Friday that Ukraine could strike targets within Russia using German weapons. This decision was made after several NATO allies, including the United States, indicated their willingness to relax the rules on weapons, allowing the Ukrainian troops, who are on the losing side, to attack Russian targets with weapons received from the West.

It is clearer than daylight that the losing Globalist Mafia will do anything to plunge the world into a world war or even a nuclear war!

Moscow, as revealed in these statements, finds that NATO is resolutely pushing the boundaries, which now directly threatens the security of the Russian state.

Now Moscow is talking about 'nuclear deterrent' measures, which means the permanent deployment of nuclear weapons and targeting NATO bases across Europe.

Where are American tactical nuclear weapons stationed in Europe?

Currently, approximately 100 American tactical nuclear weapons (TNWs) - designed for battlefield or limited strike scenarios - are located at six bases in five NATO countries in Europe and Western Asia, including:

Buchel Air Base in Germany (reportedly housing the 15 TNWs).

Kleine Brogel Air Base in Belgium (15 TNWs).

Volkel Air Base in the Netherlands (15 TNWs).

Aviano and Ghedi Torre Air Bases in Italy (35 TNWs).

Incirlik Air Base in Turkey (20 TNWs).

Greece, along with Spain, Bulgaria, and Romania, falls under the general designation of 'other NATO countries'.

"The United States' nuclear arsenal in Europe consists of B-61 gravity bombs, designed to be deployed by allied bombers or fighter aircraft. The B-61 is known to be three times more powerful than the American atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945."

Meanwhile, as reported by Moscow journalist Thanasis Avgerinos, the Russians are warning the United States and NATO not to deploy nuclear weapons in European (see Poland, Greece, Romania, etc.) and Asian countries, otherwise they will be forced to resort to nuclear deterrence!

"We will do this if the United States continues to deploy short and medium-range nuclear weapons in European countries."

In an interview with the RIA news agency, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov indicated that his country considers the planned delivery of F-16 fighter jets capable of carrying nuclear warheads to Ukraine as a 'message' from NATO.

"They are trying to tell us that the USA and NATO won't stop anywhere in Ukraine," emphasized Lavrov.

"However, we hope that the ongoing Russian-Belarusian military talks on the use of non-strategic nuclear weapons will bring our opponents to their senses, reminding them of the devastating consequences of any further nuclear escalation," he added.

"Lavrov also stated that Russia may take further nuclear deterrent measures if the United States deploys intermediate-range and short-range missiles in Europe and Asia."

Source:https://szmm.substack.com/p/miutan-a-nyugat-urai-ugy-veltek-ukrajna

Invite me for a coffee.

White, Christian Europe must be destroyed at all costs! Biden's latest big idea: diverting some of the immigrants flooding into the US from the Mexican border to the European Union!

White, Christian Europe must be destroyed at all costs! Biden's latest big idea: diverting some of the immigrants flooding into the US from the Mexican border to the European Union!

As if Europe, especially Western Europe, hasn't already been sufficiently ruined by African, Middle Eastern, and later Ukrainian immigrants, old Joe Biden, or rather the globalists pushing Biden's buttons, now have another "great" idea.

According to information released by the American CBS channel, Biden's Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, plans to relocate some immigrants from Latin America to Greece and Italy.

CBS also adds that the aim of this idea is to reduce the migration pressure on the United States-Mexico border.In other words, it is about immigrants arriving in Latin America from all over the world, using it as a springboard to reach the United States.

The US Post explains:

"The initiative would require Greece and Italy to accept immigrants detained in immigration offices set up by the Biden administration in four Latin American countries last year, in order to screen out immigrants hoping to enter the United States."

Of course, there is no international agreement that would allow this vile migrant campaign to take place.

It could only be realized based on bilateral agreements between Washington and Rome, as well as Athens.

However, Italy and Greece have long been suffocated by the migration wave unleashed in 2015 with the blessing of Angela Merkel.

Year after year, the two states ask Brussels to "share" the burden of immigrants with the other EU countries.

This is how immigrant quotas came into existence.

Why would Greece and Italy be interested in accommodating Biden's immigrants arriving from Latin America now?

It's not hard to figure out.

The question is, can the American globalist government compel the European Union, along with its leading globalist governors, to do this?

Meanwhile, Athens and Rome are hoping that during the August migration negotiations, they can also get rid of some of the migrants already there, assuming the regulation passes that mandates the redistribution of existing immigrants among all EU countries.

But the big poetic question remains: why don't the United States, Greece, Italy, or other EU countries protect their borders from immigrants, and why do they passively watch as they are overrun?

Clearly, the plan is the replacement of the white European population and the destruction of Christian civilization, which brainwashed individuals dismiss as just another conspiracy theory. And meanwhile, hordes of Arab, African, and Latin American immigrants are breaking down their doors.

VIDEO

Source:https://szmm.substack.com/p/a-feher-kereszteny-europat-mindenaron

Invite me for a coffee.

America has zeroed out its military industry in a perfect storm . Written by FERENC KOVÁCS

 Beneficiaries of wars: Weapons manufacturers and the military industry generally benefit from wars, as they are involved in substantial military expenditures. They can profit from the sale of weapons, equipment, and technology. (America is the world's largest arms exporter, and the world's top 5 arms manufacturers are all American).

The privatization and hollowing out of the American defense industry have become increasingly significant issues. According to analysts, production deficiencies, inadequate workforce, and disruptions in the supply chains have hindered the United States from supplying weapons to Ukraine.

After Russia launched a special military operation in Ukraine in February 2022, the United States pledged "unwavering support for the preservation of Ukraine's sovereignty." This support has materialized in over $75 billion worth of security assistance to date, and the United States has committed to assisting Ukraine until the fighting is concluded. As U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken stated when announcing another arms shipment to Ukraine, "The United States, our allies, and partners stand firmly with Ukraine as long as necessary."

These unlimited commitments to supply Ukraine with weapons to counter Russian aggression have invoked parallels with World War II. Weeks after the start of the fighting, Paul Krugman, a columnist for The New York Times, argued that the United States and its allies were "providing material means for the defenders of freedom to keep fighting" in Ukraine. Journalist Elliot Ackerman subsequently wrote that workers building rockets for Ukraine's defense were "key members of America's democracy arsenal." President Joe Biden also embraced the analogy of the "arsenal of democracy." When he visited a Lockheed Martin factory in Troy, Alabama, in May of last year, Biden told the audience that the United States had built the weapons and equipment that helped defend freedom and sovereignty in Europe years ago, and it continues to do so today.

However, this rhetoric does not align with reality. Production deficiencies, inadequate workforce, and disruptions in the supply chains have hindered the United States from supplying weapons to Ukraine and more broadly enhancing the country's defense capabilities. These issues are deeply rooted in the history of the American defense industry since World War II. The privatization during the Cold War and the reduction in federal investments and oversight of defense contracts since the 1960s have contributed to inefficiencies, waste, and a lack of priorities that complicate American assistance to Ukraine today, as noted in an analysis by Michael Brenes, Acting Director of the Strategic Center at Yale University's International Security Studies, and lecturer in the History Department at Yale, published in Foreign Affairs.

Following the fall of the Berlin Wall, major players in the American defense industry consolidated and downsized their operations and workforce. In pursuit of greater profits, they sought to secure costly government contracts for experimental weapons, often at the expense of small arms and ammunition production. As a result, the industry was ill-prepared to respond to the crisis in Ukraine and did not align with the broader national security needs of the United States and its allies. While reforms are possible, there are no quick solutions to these self-inflicted problems.

Today's defense industry bears little resemblance to the American wartime production system during World War II. At that time, the industry was largely government-controlled. Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal emphasized economic regulation and relied on agencies such as the Works Progress Administration to boost employment, paving the way for later wartime contracting.

In 1942, the New Deal agencies established the War Production Board, which mobilized businesses and allocated resources to the war effort. Weapon production focused on shipbuilding and aircraft manufacturing, with companies operating mainly in the industrial centers of the Northeast and Midwest, in government-owned and operated facilities known as Government-Owned, Government-Operated (GOGO) plants. The government owned nearly 90 percent of the production capacity for aircraft, ships, weapons, and ammunition. This contrasts with the current environment where, since 2011, over 88 percent of new procurements consist of commercial items, and private capital invests over $6 billion annually in the defense industry.

When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in 1941, the federal control of defense production and the swift response by the Roosevelt administration allowed for a rapid shift from civilian to military production at companies like Ford and General Motors, which switched from manufacturing cars to producing bombers. It wasn't just the major corporations that thrived. The federal government also aimed to support small subcontractors that produced war-related materials in government-operated plants. Unlike today's "Big Five" (Boeing, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Raytheon), the industry was not dominated by a small group of powerful entrepreneurs.

Source: https://index.hu/kulfold/2023/07/09/haboru-orosz-ukran-konfliktus-egyesult-allamok-hadiipar/